[blml] Réf. : Re: Do we play bridge or not?
Alain Gottcheiner
agot at ulb.ac.be
Thu Aug 9 15:26:12 CEST 2007
-------Message original-------
De : Ed Reppert
Date : 09/08/2007 14:29:11
A : Bridge Laws Mailing List
Sujet : Re: [blml] Do we play bridge or not?
>(AG) I think that, because many play that a double demands a
> spade lead, a break in tempo suggests it, ergo the TD should
> disallow a
> spade lead, provided some other lead is pretty possible. A Heart
> cetainly
> is, according to our comments (I would choose a Heart myself) .
If you're going to use this logic, then the question is not "what do
many play", but "what does *this* pair play" a double to mean. If
everybody and his brother plays it to demand a spade lead, but this
pair do not, then the conclusion that the hesitation suggests leading
spades is wrong.
AG : not necessarily. It might well be the case that the player knew most
played "double = spades", and took some time to decide whether partner would
understand it as such. In that case, the suggestion is indeed there,
notwithstanding the absence of any agreement.
_______________________________________________
blml mailing list
blml at amsterdamned.org
http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070809/7e863522/attachment-0001.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1458 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070809/7e863522/attachment-0001.jpeg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 37059 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070809/7e863522/attachment-0001.gif
More information about the blml
mailing list