[blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

Ed Reppert ereppert at rochester.rr.com
Fri Aug 10 22:41:01 CEST 2007


On Aug 10, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Harald Skjæran wrote:

> Average Hand is defined by the WBF in it's "System Policy" as a  
> hand containing 10 high card points (Milton Work) with no  
> distributional values.

S AKQJ
H xxx
D xxx
C xxx

S Axxx
H Kxx
D QJx
C xxx

S Axxx
H Kxx
D Qxx
C Jxx

All these hands fit the above WBF definition. Do they all have the  
same strength? If not, the WBF definition is flawed. As it must be, I  
think, particularly if it relies on the Work Count.


More information about the blml mailing list