[blml] played or not ?

David Barton david.j.barton at lineone.net
Thu Aug 16 16:59:01 CEST 2007


Can we go back to basics.

Consider 5 declarers who have arrived at 3N after
an uncontested auction of 1D - 3D// 3N.
Each deluded declarer imagines he is playing in
diamonds and attempts to ruff a spade in dummy.

Declarer A instructs "ruff"
Declarer B instructs "ruff small"
Declarer C instructs "ruff with the 3"
Declarer D instructs "ruff with the 3 of diamonds"
Declarer E instructs "3 of diamonds".

Of these only declarers D and E have complied with proper
procedure in accordance with L46A.

Which declarers have played the 3 of diamonds?

*****************************************
  david.j.barton at lineone.net
*****************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070816/90a75326/attachment-0002.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1458 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070816/90a75326/attachment-0002.jpeg 
-------------- next part --------------
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.11.19/955 - Release Date: 15/08/2007 16:55


More information about the blml mailing list