[blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?

Brian brian at meadows.pair.com
Mon Aug 20 10:53:56 CEST 2007


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:10:44 +0900
Robert Geller <geller at nifty.com> wrote:

> 
> > no need to try to tell the
> >rest of us what we can or can't write. 
> >
> >Brian. 
> 
> If this is just a social bulletin board for people who want to kill
> time then anyone should be able to write whatever he wants, but if
> this is a serious forum for discussing the laws of bridge we ought to
> stick (mostly) to serious discussion on the laws of bridge and people
> who want to just have fun should go someplace else.
> 
> Which is it?
> 

I'm not advocating off-topic posts, nor have I ever done so, and I
suspect that you knew full well what I meant. But OK, let's make it
explicit, just for you. **Provided the discussion pertains to the laws
of bridge**, then (IMO) post away, and leave it up to the individual
reader to decide what/who they do or don't want to read. Is that
better? 

I say again, if you think a thread has outlived its usefulness, tell
your mailer to ignore it, and leave the rest of us to make that
decision for ourselves. It will take you less time to set the ignore
flag than it took you to write your message asking that the thread be
curtailed. and the effect will be the same from your point of view. 

If your mailer doesn't offer that feature, then get yourself a decent
mailer. 


Brian. 

- -- 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGyVakX39R2QaHMdMRAtKiAKCfmak1tsDXqfyLZceRMPTg9RWrfQCgjOJc
+9O1W8IjlMA/3BsBc03ePbY=
=qZiY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the blml mailing list