[blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?

[Brian]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:09:07 +0100
Nigel <Guthrie at NTLworld.com> wrote:

> 
> Here it would suffice that the law...
> ... not only specify that, to play a card from dummy, declarer must 
> touch it or unambiguously name it by suit or rank
> ... but also specify a penalty for an attempt to designate a card
> from dummy in an illegal way.
> 

In order for that suggestion to be even close to workable, you are going
to have to expand the list of valid designations. Either that, or hand
out a gazillion penalties before you've taught everyone that they can't
say "ruff" any more. The secretary birds would have a field day (month,
year, decade...)

Brian. 

- -- 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGyeP0X39R2QaHMdMRAoPLAKCaMYlEsXd9E5lm1nqwxqOrDbfOOwCgrI5L
cD3SnS1eDqP56kwverB+cuY=
=RG7h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----