[blml] Alert and alarmed (was continued) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Tim West-Meads]

Richard wrote:
> 
> My two cents worth is that an Alert regulation which is
> fully or partially contrary to the first sentence of
> Law 75A - "Special partnership agreements, whether
> explicit or implicit, must be fully and freely
> available to the opponents" - is an illegal regulation.

A reasonable point.  However the EBU regulation that a weak pre-empt
style be clearly disclosed on the CC but is neither alertable nor
pre-alertable can hardly be said to conflict with L75a.

Tim