August 2007 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Wed Aug 1 00:46:56 CEST 2007
Ending: Fri Aug 31 07:50:29 CEST 2007
Messages: 609

• [blml] played or not?   Robin Barker
• [blml] Four in One [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   David Barton
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   David Barton
• [blml] played or not ?   David Barton
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   David Barton
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   David Barton
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   David Barton
• [blml] Who's afraid of the ...   Adam Beneschan
• [blml] Who's afraid of the ...   Adam Beneschan
• [blml] Who's afraid of the ...   Adam Beneschan
• [blml] Lead Problem   Adam Beneschan
• [blml] Lead Problem   Adam Beneschan
• [blml] Lead Problem [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Adam Beneschan
• [blml] Illegal Convention (Bermuda Bowl CoC)   Adam Beneschan
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Adam Beneschan
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Matthias Berghaus
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Matthias Berghaus
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Matthias Berghaus
• [blml] Fw: played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Matthias Berghaus
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Matthias Berghaus
• [blml] AI = UI, and influence   Brian
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   Brian
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   Brian
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Brian
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Brian
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Brian
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Brian
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Brian
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Brian
• [blml] played or not ?   Brian
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Brian
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Brian
• [blml] British bridge terminology   Brian
• [blml] Réf. : Your lead please?   Brian
• [blml] Do we play bridge or not?   Wayne Burrows
• [blml] nashville 12   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] Lead Problem   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] Lead Problem   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] Lead Problem   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] Lead Problem   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] Lead Problem   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Richard agrees with Herman (was Law 45D) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Illegal Convention (Bermuda Bowl CoC)   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Question   Jeff Easterson
• [blml] bizarre?   Jeff Easterson
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP   Jeff Easterson
• [blml] have we really ......   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] nashville 12 [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] played or not?   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] Do we play bridge or not?   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] Recondite apostle (was played or not?) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] "Autogenous power" (sic)   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] Who's afraid of the ... [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] Standards   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] Lead Problem (continued)   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] Standards   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] British bridge terminology   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] But me no buts [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] But me no buts [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Grattan Endicott
• [blml] discriminations (wasTeam tactics)   Roger Eymard
• [blml] played or not?   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] bizarre?   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] But me no buts [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Dummy play   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] But me no buts [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Standards   JOAN GERARD
• [blml] Who's afraid of the ... [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Robert Geller
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Robert Geller
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Robert Geller
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Robert Geller
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Robert Geller
• [blml] Lead Problem   Robert Geller
• [blml] Dummy play   Robert Geller
• [blml] Illegal Convention (Bermuda Bowl CoC)   Robert Geller
• [blml] Illegal Convention (Bermuda Bowl CoC)   Robert Geller
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP   Robert Geller
• [blml] Réf. : Re: nashville 12   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Four in One [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] AI = UI, and influence   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Four in One [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] played or not?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : Re: ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Réf. : played or not?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : Re: ...have we really come to this???   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Do we play bridge or not?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] RXf. : Re: ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Do we play bridge or not?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] RXf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not ?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not ?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Natural versus Convention, yet again [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not ?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not ?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Bid or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : Re: played or not ?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Lead Problem   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Lead Problem   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Lead Problem   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Lead Problem   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Lead Problem   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : Re: British bridge terminology   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : bizarre?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Your lead please?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : But me no buts [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : Re: But me no buts [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Double Dummy play [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : Your lead please?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Your lead please?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Your lead please?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   David Grabiner
• [blml] Bid or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   David Grabiner
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   David Grabiner
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   David Grabiner
• [blml] Standards   Guthrie
• [blml] bizarre?   Guthrie
• [blml] Lead Problem (continued)   Guthrie
• [blml] Lead Problem (continued)   Guthrie
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Guthrie
• [blml] Lead Problem (continued)   Guthrie
• [blml] Your lead please?   Guthrie
• [blml] Dummy play   Guthrie
• [blml] Do we play bridge or not?   Laszlo Hegedus
• [blml] Lead Problem   Laszlo Hegedus
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Lead Problem   Laszlo Hegedus
• [blml] Your lead please?   Laszlo Hegedus
• [blml] Disclosure   Eric Landau
• [blml] nashville 12   Eric Landau
• [blml] ...have we really come to this???   Eric Landau
• [blml] played or not?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Eric Landau
• [blml] played or not?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Eric Landau
• [blml] played or not?   Eric Landau
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Eric Landau
• [blml] Fw: played or not?   Eric Landau
• [blml] played or not?   Eric Landau
• [blml] ...have we really come to this???   Eric Landau
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   Eric Landau
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   Eric Landau
• [blml] played or not?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not ?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Natural versus Convention, yet again [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Eric Landau
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Lead Problem   Eric Landau
• [blml] bizarre?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Your lead please?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Your lead please?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Eric Landau
• [blml] But me no buts [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sinot Martin
• [blml] AI = UI, and influence   John R. Mayne
• [blml] Lead Problem   John R. Mayne
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not ?   Tony Musgrove
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not ?   Tony Musgrove
• [blml] nashville 12   Nigel
• [blml] nashville 12 [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Nigel
• [blml] nashville 12 [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Nigel
• [blml] Encrypted psychs   Nigel
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Nigel
• [blml] played or not?   Nigel
• [blml] Do we play bridge or not?   Nigel
• [blml] played or not?   Nigel
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Nigel
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Nigel
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Nigel
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Nigel
• [blml] Natural versus Convention, yet again [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Nigel
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not ?   Nigel
• [blml] Natural versus Convention, yet again   Nigel
• [blml] Who's afraid of the ...   Nigel
• [blml] Who's afraid of the ... [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Nigel
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Nigel
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Nigel
• [blml] Lead Problem   Nigel
• [blml] played or not?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Do we play bridge or not?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Do we play bridge or not?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Rif. : Re: ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] Do we play bridge or not?   Sven Pran
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   Sven Pran
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   Sven Pran
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Who's afraid of the ... [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] Who's afraid of the ... [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] Who's afraid of the ...   Sven Pran
• [blml] Who's afraid of the ... [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Natural versus Convention, yet again [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Who's afraid of the ... [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] played or not ?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Richard agrees with Herman (was Law 45D) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] Lead Problem   Sven Pran
• [blml] Richard agrees with Herman (was Law 45D) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] Richard agrees with Herman (was Law 45D) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] Standards   Sven Pran
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Sven Pran
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   Sven Pran
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Dummy play [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Sven Pran
• [blml] But me no buts [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] Réf. : But me no buts [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Réf. : Re: But me no buts [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] Your lead please?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Your lead please?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Your lead please?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP   Sven Pran
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Sven Pran
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   John Probst
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   John Probst
• [blml] Do we play bridge or not?   John Probst
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   John Probst
• [blml] Bid or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   John Probst
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   John Probst
• [blml] Lead Problem   John Probst
• [blml] Lead Problem   John Probst
• [blml] Lead Problem (continued)   John Probst
• [blml] Lead Problem (continued)   John Probst
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   John Probst
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   John Probst
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   John Probst
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   John Probst
• [blml] AI = UI, and influence   Ed Reppert
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ed Reppert
• [blml] played or not?   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Ed Reppert
• [blml] played or not?   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Do we play bridge or not?   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Ed Reppert
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ed Reppert
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ed Reppert
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ed Reppert
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ed Reppert
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ed Reppert
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   Ed Reppert
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Natural versus Convention, yet again [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ed Reppert
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Bid or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ed Reppert
• [blml] nashville 12 [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Jean-Pierre Rocafort
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Jean-Pierre Rocafort
• [blml] British bridge terminology   Jean-Pierre Rocafort
• [blml] British bridge terminology   Jean-Pierre Rocafort
• [blml] British bridge terminology   Jean-Pierre Rocafort
• [blml] Dummy play   Jean-Pierre Rocafort
• [blml] Dummy play   Jean-Pierre Rocafort
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Jean-Pierre Rocafort
• [blml] Lead Problem   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Lead Problem (continued)   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Lead Problem (continued) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Lead Problem (continued)   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] played or not?   Ben Schelen
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Ben Schelen
• [blml] Dummy play [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ben Schelen
• [blml] Do we play bridge or not?   Harald Skjæran
• [blml] Do we play bridge or not?   Harald Skjæran
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Harald Skjæran
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Harald Skjæran
• [blml] Natural versus Convention, yet again [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Harald Skjæran
• [blml] Natural versus Convention, yet again [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Harald Skjæran
• [blml] Natural versus Convention, yet again [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Harald Skjæran
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   Harald Skjæran
• [blml] Lead Problem   Harald Skjæran
• [blml] Your lead please?   Harald Skjæran
• [blml] Imbecile   Harald Skjæran
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Harald Skjæran
• [blml] Alert and alarmed (was continued) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Harald Skjæran
• [blml] Illegal Convention (Bermuda Bowl CoC)   Harald Skjæran
• [blml] Do we play bridge or not?   Hans van Staveren
• [blml] Do we play bridge or not?   Hans van Staveren
• [blml] Your lead please?   Andre Steffens
• [blml] Your lead please?   Andre Steffens
• [blml] played or not?   André Steffens
• [blml] Fw: played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   André Steffens
• [blml] List of BLML Abbreviations   Henk Uijterwaal
• [blml] BLML Usage statistics   Henk Uijterwaal
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   Henk Uijterwaal
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   Henk Uijterwaal
• [blml] Please ignore   Henk Uijterwaal
• [blml] Please ignore   Henk Uijterwaal
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   Henk Uijterwaal
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   Henk Uijterwaal
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   Henk Uijterwaal
• [blml] Question   Henk Uijterwaal
• [blml] Mail formats   Henk Uijterwaal
• [blml] Disclosure   Herman De Wael
• [blml] played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Do we play bridge or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Fw: played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Fw: Fw: played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] There is nothing like a claim [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Fw: played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] The moon's a balloon [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] The moon's a balloon [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not ?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not ?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Richard agrees with Herman (was Law 45D) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Richard agrees with Herman (was Law 45D) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Richard agrees with Herman (was Law 45D) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Richard agrees with Herman (was Law 45D) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Richard agrees with Herman (was Law 45D) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bid or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] bizarre?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] bizarre?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Imbecile   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Standards [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Dummy play [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Double Dummy play [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Dummy play   Herman De Wael
• [blml] nashville 12 [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] nashville 12 [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Réf. : Re: ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Rif. : Re: ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Who's afraid of the ... [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Natural versus Convention, yet again [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Lead Problem (continued) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Lead Problem (continued)   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Lead Problem (continued)   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Alert and alarmed (was continued) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Dummy play   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] ...have we really come to this???   Steve Willner
• [blml] Disclosure   Steve Willner
• [blml] Natural versus Convention, yet again   Steve Willner
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   Steve Willner
• [blml] Who's afraid of the ...   Steve Willner
• [blml] Bid or not?   Steve Willner
• [blml] Richard agrees with Herman (was Law 45D) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Steve Willner
• [blml] Illegal Convention (Bermuda Bowl CoC)   Steve Willner
• [blml] Alert and alarmed (was continued)   Steve Willner
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   Steve Willner
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Steve Willner
• [blml] Do we play bridge or not?   Steve Wright
• [blml] played or not?   Steve Wright
• [blml] Lead Problem (continued)   Gampas at aol.com
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   Gampas at aol.com
• [blml] nashville 12 [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] nashville 12 [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Ignorantia juris non excusat [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Four in One [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Former 1987 Duplicate Laws [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Four in One [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] [blml played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] There is nothing like a claim [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Paused for thought or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Who's afraid of the ... [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Who's afraid of the ... [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] The moon's a balloon [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Who's afraid of the ... [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Natural versus Convention, yet again [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Who's afraid of the ... [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Recondite apostle (was played or not?) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Who's afraid of the ... [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] The moon's a balloon [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Natural versus Convention, yet again [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Irony or irritation? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Who's afraid of the ... [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Irony or irritation? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Who's afraid of the ... [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] The moon's a balloon [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Natural versus Convention, yet again [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Who's afraid of the ... [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Bid or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Richard agrees with Herman (was Law 45D) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Lead Problem [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Bid or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Lead Problem [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Lead Problem (continued) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Lead Problem (continued) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Lead Problem (continued) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Alert and alarmed (was continued) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Standards [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Dummy play [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Alert and alarmed (was continued) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Double Dummy play [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] But me no buts [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] played or not ?   ciska.zuur at planet.nl
• [blml] But me no buts [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   ciska.zuur at planet.nl
• [blml] played or not?   raija
• [blml] Do we play bridge or not?   raija
• [blml] Fw: played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   raija
• [blml] Fw: Fw: played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   raija
• [blml] This is how Reply should work   raija
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   raija
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   raija
• [blml] Réf. : Re: Fw: played or not?   raija
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   raija
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   raija
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   raija
• [blml] Lead Problem   raija
• [blml] Lead Problem   raija
• [blml] Lead Problem   raija
• [blml] Lead Problem   raija
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   raija
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   raija
• [blml] Law 45D - Was card misplayed by Dummy?   PeterEidt at t-online.de
• [blml] played or not? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   gesta at tiscali.co.uk
• [blml] Réf. : played or not?   ton
• [blml] Protect with 2 HCP?   hirsch9000 at verizon.net
• [blml] Natural versus Convention, yet again   richard willey
• [blml] Natural versus Convention, yet again [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard willey

Last message date: Fri Aug 31 07:50:29 CEST 2007
Archived on: Fri Aug 31 07:54:04 CEST 2007

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...