[blml] Double and appeal
Guthrie
guthrie at ntlworld.com
Sun Dec 2 01:50:20 CET 2007
[Paul Lamford]
And I agree with either 2S+1 or 3S= as an adjusted score.
[Sven Pran]
Sorry, I fail to see how East with any "normal" defense can avoid two
losers in spades and one in each side suit for a total of five losers?
[nige1]
Would Torsten please tell us how many tricks were made in spade
contracts at other tables? (Assuming that the competition was for
pairs or multiple teams)
I realise that a director would be burnt as a heretic for such a
suggestion. -- "The context is never exactly the same at any 2 tables"
--- but I feel this would provide a basic "sanity" test for Paul's and
my theories.
More information about the blml
mailing list