[blml] Is ordinary Stayman no longer artifical?

Gampas at aol.com Gampas at aol.com
Sun Dec 2 11:55:11 CET 2007


In a message dated 02/12/2007 01:10:07 GMT Standard Time,  
dalburn at btopenworld.com writes:

[DALB]

I have always presumed that the laws prohibit communication  between partners
other than by means of legal calls or plays ...
 
[Lamford]
 
I had presumed this only applies before the cards have been removed from  the 
wallet. If not, then I must confess to an illegal coded agreement I had with  
a former partner, where the question "Would you like a drink?" meant "How 
good  is this pair that has just arrived at our table?", and the reply "Yes, a 
pint of  lager, please." meant "Dead from the neck up."
 



   



More information about the blml mailing list