[blml] Is ordinary Stayman no longer artifical?
Gampas at aol.com
Gampas at aol.com
Sun Dec 2 11:55:11 CET 2007
In a message dated 02/12/2007 01:10:07 GMT Standard Time,
dalburn at btopenworld.com writes:
[DALB]
I have always presumed that the laws prohibit communication between partners
other than by means of legal calls or plays ...
[Lamford]
I had presumed this only applies before the cards have been removed from the
wallet. If not, then I must confess to an illegal coded agreement I had with
a former partner, where the question "Would you like a drink?" meant "How
good is this pair that has just arrived at our table?", and the reply "Yes, a
pint of lager, please." meant "Dead from the neck up."
More information about the blml
mailing list