[blml] Double and appeal

[Torsten Åstrand]

2 4H =
1 4Hx =
1 4H -1
2 3H =
1 3H +1
1 4S -1
1 3S -2
1 3S =
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Guthrie" <guthrie at ntlworld.com>
To: "Bridge Laws Mailing List" <blml at amsterdamned.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2007 1:50 AM
Subject: Re: [blml] Double and appeal


> [Paul Lamford]
> And I agree with either 2S+1 or 3S= as an adjusted score.
> 
> [Sven Pran]
> Sorry, I fail to see how East with any "normal" defense can avoid two 
> losers in spades and one in each side suit for a total of five losers?
> 
> [nige1]
> Would Torsten please tell us how many tricks were made in spade 
> contracts at other tables? (Assuming that the competition was for 
> pairs or multiple teams)
> 
> I realise that a director would be burnt as a heretic for such a 
> suggestion. -- "The context is never exactly the same at any 2 tables" 
> --- but I feel this would provide a basic "sanity" test for Paul's and 
> my theories.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> blml mailing list
> blml at amsterdamned.org
> http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml