[blml] Double and appeal
Gampas at aol.com
Gampas at aol.com
Sun Dec 2 18:14:47 CET 2007
In a message dated 02/12/2007 14:06:14 GMT Standard Time,
guthrie at ntlworld.com writes:
[Torsten Åstrand]
2 4H =
1 4Hx =
1 4H -1
2 3H =
1 3H +1
1 4S -1
1 3S -2
1 3S =
Playing IMPS
[nige1]
Thank you Torsten. Not particularly conclusive but these results
demonstrate that (in practice rather than theory) 9 tricks in spades
is a possibility.
[Lamford] Yes, it would appear that the correct adjustment should be to a
weighted score, 67% of 3S = and 33% of 3S -1 (I think we always reject 3S - 2,
as the declarer can make 8 tricks on normal play).
More information about the blml
mailing list