[blml] Double and appeal

[Alain Gottcheiner]

Gampas at aol.com a écrit :
> In a message dated 01/12/2007 14:21:44 GMT Standard Time,  svenpran at online.no 
> writes:
>
>   
>> And I agree with either 2S+1 or 3S= as an adjusted  score.
>>     
>
> Sorry, I fail to see how East with any "normal" defense can avoid  two losers
> in spades and one in each side suit for a total of five  losers?
>  
> Yes, I agree. It looks easy to switch to a diamond in time. As the 3H bid  
> seems fine, I would therefore adjust to 3S-1.
>  
>
>   
AG : if declarer lets the HQ hold and you switch to a diamond, 3S might 
well make (small spade from the hand)