[blml] Is ordinary Stayman no longer artificial? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Ed Reppert]

On Dec 5, 2007, at 10:51 PM, Jerry Fusselman wrote:

> Roughly half the hands opposite a 1NT opener would find it  
> worthwhile to bid
> Stayman, and roughly a half would never dream of it, which proves that
> there is information content in Stayman.

I have no idea if these figures are correct, but never mind. It seems  
that *any* call has some information content.

Okay. So what? I confess I no longer have any idea what the hell  
we're talking about in this thread. :-/