[blml] How do you deal with this mess?
Gampas at aol.com
Gampas at aol.com
Thu Dec 6 13:04:50 CET 2007
In a message dated 05/12/2007 21:53:25 GMT Standard Time,
guthrie at ntlworld.com writes:
[nige1]
>In order to rule to keep the final result -- 2CX-4 by the other side
>-- IMO, you have to judge that the change of call was "condoned"; but
>was it really condoned?
[Paul Lamford]
If the next person bids over it, then it has to be treated as condoned. The
board could easily have been set aside and a referee telephoned during the
break for refreshments (I hope these were being provided) or at the end of the
match. Or even there and then in the middle of the auction.
To amend the result now would, in my view, be no different to a recent
Crockfords match at a London Club, where a team, trailing by 64 IMPs at half-time,
wanted the first 16 boards replayed as they had not been hand-dealt at the
table, as required by the rules. Instead the club's duplimated boards had been
used. They were given short shrift by a referee, but were allowed to hand
deal the remaining 16 boards.
More information about the blml
mailing list