[blml] claim

[Gampas at aol.com]

In a message dated 12/12/2007 06:32:14 GMT Standard Time,  
eitan.bridge at gmail.com writes:

>Not necessarily so. See the second half of law 68B, which would  appear to 
apply to >the case in question. 
 
Indeed, but in the case in question the partner of the person who attempted  
to claim then stated (or seemed to from the report) that the defence had the  
remainder. There was thus a new claim and play ceases under  68D.