[blml] claim

[Eric Landau]

On Dec 12, 2007, at 9:46 AM, Alain Gottcheiner wrote:

> Eric Landau a écrit :
>>>
>>> OK, let that be the TD's decision. What we then need to decide is
>>> whether it is rational for a player who thinks QT are good to win  
>>> the
>>> trick with the 10 or with either.
>>>
>>> I say tricks are won with the lowest possible, and led from the top
>>> (thus 4 tricks to defenders)  <snip>

JFTR, I didn't actually write this.  But I do agree with it.

> AG : I don't know about general jurisprudency, but ours is such. This
> means you can't unblock or crocodilize unless you specify it;

Ditto.

> A related case : when instructing "take" to dummy, who plays 4th to  
> the
> trick, declarer is deemed to have called for the lowest card that  
> would
> take the trick.

Three out of three.  But this one is actually explicit in TFLB (L46B1).


Eric Landau
1107 Dale Drive
Silver Spring MD 20910
ehaa at starpower.net