[blml] The new L27C2 [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Jesper Dybdal]

On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:25:31 +1100, richard.hills at immi.gov.au wrote:

>The "loose" interpretation of "incorporates" is easily possible.
>The WBF and European Zone have not yet interpreted "incorporates",
>so the Danish Regulating Authority can issue a temporary "loose"
>interpretation.

Yes - that part is easy enough.

>Difficult to see any possibility of a later adjustment, given that
>Law 27C1 specifically varies Law 16D.
>
>But perhaps Law 12B1 and Law 12A1 could be collectively used to
>counterbalance a "loose" interpretation of "incorporates".

Perhaps.  But I am not quite happy about the idea of using L12B1/L12A1
to - almost - effectively reinstate L16D in a situation where L27C1
explicitly says that L16D does not apply.

Thanks to you and to Grattan for the responses.  I think we will have to
go for either the strict interpretation or the somewhat distasteful use
of L12B1/L12A1.
-- 
Jesper Dybdal, Denmark.
http://www.dybdal.dk (in Danish).