[blml] claim

[Jerry Fusselman]

Kojak:
> Me, for one.  Because the 2001 minute is wrong. Landau has given a much
> clearer interpretation of the extant law at that time.  To cancel the claim
> because the partner objected to the concession is ludicrous, in my not so
> humble opinion. The misguiding minute gave life to the ridiculous ruling of
> 8 penalty cards in the famous 3NT ruling. I strongly then, and continue to
> now, believe that the members of the WBFLC involved did not have a working
> knowledge of the English language, and were looking at a small part of
> claims and concessions without understanding what the law was saying. It is
> my personal opinion that putting claims and concessions into the same basket
> is a mistake.
>

How interesting.  When you direct, do you abide by that misguided minute?

Jerry Fusselman