[blml] 60% session in IMPs

[Robert Geller]

Hi,
In this case I agree completely with you that "the equivalent in 
imps of a 60% session" is not well defined.
-Bob


Konrad Ciborowski さんは書きました:
>Hi,
>
>It's me again.
>
>L12C2c
>
>"The foregoing is modified for a non-offending contestant that
>obtains a session score exceeding 60% of the available 
matchpoints or
>for an offending contestant that obtains a session score that is 
less
>than 40% of the available matchpoints (or the equivalent in 
imps).
>Such contestants are awarded the percentage obtained (or the 
>equivalent in imps) on the other boards of that session."
>
>What is the equivalent in imps of a 60% session?
>
>In an IMP session of 20 deals (Butler scoring)
>the highest possible score is 24 IMPs x 20 = 480 IMPs. 
>60% of that is +288 IMPs a score almost unheard of.
>
>    Does this mean that we award +3 as average plus in a 20 deal
>IMP session unless the contestant's score is +288 IMPs
>in which case we award him another 288 IMPs as average plus 
>(his session score) making his score +578 IMPs?
>
>Makes no sense to me.
>
>It looks that the remarks in parenthesis about the
>equivalent in IMPs were added "without pause for thought".
>Or, as usual, I'm missing something that is obvious to the rest 
of
>the world.
>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Konrad Ciborowski
>Krak〓, Poland
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----
>Diverse Extreme Team Goes Dakar
>>> http://link.interia.pl/f1ca9
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>blml mailing list
>blml at amsterdamned.org
>http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml

-----------------------------------------------------
Robert (Bob) Geller,     Tokyo, Japan        geller at nifty.com