[blml] claim

[WILLIAM SCHODER]

I see no problem with "play continues" to resolve the disagreement with a 
concession, however I also see no reason to discard rectification of the 
claim of tricks.  That was and is what the law once said, was minuted 
otherwise by a WBFLC decision, and again now says.

Kojak


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tim West-Meads" <twm at cix.co.uk>
To: <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: [blml] claim


> Grattan wrote:
>
> > +=+ 2007 Law 68B2 applies, regardless of whether or
> > not a concession is in company with a claim, when a
> > player attempts to concede one or more tricks and his
> > partner immediately objects. In these circumstance the
> > law requires that 'play continues' (sic).
> >                                      ~ Grattan ~   +=+
>
> Were that the case the authors would not have deleted the words "or claim"
> from the proposed text.  Claims are not cancelled by an objection to an
> accompanying concession as the law is written.
>
> Tim
>
> _______________________________________________
> blml mailing list
> blml at amsterdamned.org
> http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
>