[blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Herman De Wael]

I resent this, and it's something I've warned Richard about before.

A: the personal attack is totally unnecessary - and before he 
apologizes as to it not being meant as a personal attack, I've felt it 
as such.

B: the thing being said is totally wrong. L40B3 disallows varying 
understandings. Richard accuses the DwS of vayring explanations. I 
don't see how this can be forbidden by a law that has nothing to do 
with it.

I demand an apology.

richard.hills at immi.gov.au wrote:
> 
> For example, an opponent asks partner about your bid.  Pard
> gives an answer showing that he has completely forgotten.  You
> have a prior agreement with pard to vary your understandings
> to avoid disaster (and a prior agreement to vary your later
> explanations a la De Wael School to prevent pard having UI
> restrictions).
> 

-- 
Herman DE WAEL
Antwerpen Belgium
http://users.skynet.be/hermandw/index.html