[blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Konrad Ciborowski]

> For example, an opponent asks partner about your bid.  Pard
> gives an answer showing that he has completely forgotten.  You
> have a prior agreement with pard to vary your understandings
> to avoid disaster (and a prior agreement to vary your later
> explanations a la De Wael School to prevent pard having UI
> restrictions).

De Wael School has nothing to do with varying understandings.
You give different explanations to prevent UI transmission
but you still bid as if you haven't heard partner's
explanations. You keep bidding according to your
systemic understanding, this doesn't change.

Coming up: Richard explaining why L1 makes
dWS illegal.


Konrad Ciborowski
Kraków, Poland 



----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tysiace smiesznych filmikow z sieci. 
Sprawdz >> http://link.interia.pl/f1ca7