[blml] Disclosure (was Psyches & deviations) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Tim West-Meads]

Grattan wrote:
> +=+ But is not the totality of our agreed methods 
> a partnership understanding? - and do we not add 
> to it each time we make a call in a particular situation 
> for the first time and discover its intended meaning? 

That's a better description of the "totality of disclosable knowledge".
Most partnerships have agreements (which may be explicit or implicit and 
are subject to regulation if conventional) - these agreements can often 
be grouped together as "system".  Then they have known disagreements (I 
open 2N about half a point lighter than pard, he opens weak 2s of which 
I marginally disapprove).  These are basically matters of 
style/judgement and might be described as "understandings" or 
"disclosable disagreements" we have discussed the issues and failed to 
come to agreement.  On top of that there's partnership experience (e.g. 
pard occasionally psychs his 1N overcalls when nv in 3rd) this too is 
disclosable but is not a matter of agreement or understanding (we have 
no systemic protection to deal with such psychs).

Tim