[blml] Disclosure (was Psyches & deviations) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
Wayne Burrows
wjburrows at gmail.com
Thu Feb 1 18:50:25 CET 2007
On 01/02/07, Grattan Endicott <grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>
> from Grattan Endicott
> grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
> [also gesta at tiscali.co.uk]
> *****************************
> "They who sin with caution,
> whilst concealed,
> Grow impudently careless,
> when revealed."
> ~ Susannah Centlivre.
> ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <richard.hills at immi.gov.au>
> To: <blml at rtflb.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 1:08 AM
>
> > Richard Hills:
> >
> > In my opinion, it is only the meaning of calls
> > and plays which are partnership understandings
> > that need to be disclosed. The intended meaning
> > of a call or play which is not a partnership
> > understanding need not be disclosed.
> >
> +=+ But is not the totality of our agreed methods
> a partnership understanding? - and do we not add
> to it each time we make a call in a particular situation
> for the first time and discover its intended meaning?
No. At least that is not how it works in my partnership. We
sometimes experiment with new calls or with new hand types in
situations where we have an agreement. Sometimes we repeat these
experiments. Sometimes this leads to new agreements or understandings
sometimes it does not. Sometimes we discuss these situations sometimes
we don't.
Sometimes one experiment will lead to a new agreement but usually this
will be accompanied by a discussion. Sometimes many similar
experiments will lead to no agreement.
Wayne
More information about the blml
mailing list