[blml] Marvin French's Procedures for handling UI - part one [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Ed Reppert]

On Feb 9, 2007, at 2:19 AM, richard.hills at immi.gov.au wrote:

> It has never been a Law 16 requirement to decide whether or not a  
> suggested action is logical.

Um. I accept that is current (and possibly past, though I have no  
experience there) practice. But... The law says "the partner may not  
choose from among logical alternative actions one that could  
demonstrably have been suggested over another by the extraneous  
information." That "from among logical alternative actions" says to  
me that the suggested action must be logical. In fact, it says to me  
that if a player chooses an action that is not a member of the set  
"logical alternative actions", he has done nothing illegal.