[blml] Categories of rule-breaker [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

Nigel Guthrie at NTLworld.com
Wed Feb 21 03:53:50 CET 2007


[Kojak]
> .....Most cheats that I have encountered over these many years
> were first suspected and brought to light by ex-spectators,
> discussions after the game, party room reviews of spectators,
> etc., and the like
> .....
> taking a stance that is silly.....
>
> [Richard Hills]
> Indeed. I agree that one of Nigel's apparent points over his
> recent series of postings - that the current Lawbook encourages
> and rewards cheating - is just silly. And another of Nigel's
> apparent points - that cheating is difficult to detect - is
> even sillier.
>
> (Advance apologies to Nigel if I have again misinterpreted a
> nuance in the tenor of his postings.)
[nige1]
I wrote about law-breakers who rationalise their infractions through 
ignorance or a mistaken view of the law. Again and again, I explained 
that most were *not* cheats. But you are well aware of that, Richard :) 
No Problem :)




More information about the blml mailing list