[blml] De Wael School (was ...poll) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Roger Pewick]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <richard.hills at immi.gov.au>
To: <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: [blml] De Wael School (was ...poll) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]


> Richard Hills asserted:
>
> [big snip]
>
>>>the deliberate falsehoods which are a
>>>consequence of the De Wael School are
>>>contrary to the generally accepted nature of
>>>the game of bridge.
>
> Roger Pewick asked:
>
>>I am interested in having an enumeration as
>>to what is the generally accepted nature of
>>the game of bridge.
>
> Grattan Endicott, 14th March 2006:
>
>>>>...if you read the laws all together the
>>>>indisputable intent in this matter may be
>>>>inferred...
>
> Grattan Endicott, 15th March 2006:
>
>>>>...What the WBFLC established - even as
>>>>long ago as under the chairmanship of Ed
>>>>Theus - is that, except it be so specified,
>>>>no one law is subject to another...
>
>
> Best wishes
>
> Richard James Hills, amicus curiae
> National Training Branch, DIAC
> 02 6225 6285

As the nature of the game is generally accepted, I am puzzled at the number 
of those that persist in pursuing it.

regards
roger pewick