[blml] Definition of the term "Natural" [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

richard.hills at immi.gov.au richard.hills at immi.gov.au
Wed Feb 28 23:25:55 CET 2007


Grattan Endicott:

[snip]

>     I do not recall that the laws use the word 'natural':
>it is used in some regulations.and it is for their authors
>to define their use of the word. (Can anyone remind me
>of the existence of the word 'natural' in a law?)
>                                         ~ Grattan ~   +=+


Laval Du Breuil:

>Using WinWord on my lawbook I found only one occurrence:
>
>Law 75: Partnership Agreements
>
> Example 1 : Mistaken Explanation
>
>The actual partnership agreement is that 2D is a natural
>sign-off; the mistake was in North's explanation.

Richard Hills:

And note that even the Law 75 footnote use of the word
"natural" is unnecessary, since "natural signoff" is a
tautology.  How can a signoff, "willingness to play in the
denomination named", ever be unnatural?


Best wishes

Richard James Hills, amicus curiae
National Training Branch, DIAC
02 6225 6285

Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please advise
the sender and delete the message and attachments immediately.  This email,
including attachments, may contain confidential, sensitive, legally
privileged and/or copyright information.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. DIAC respects your privacy and
has obligations under the Privacy Act 1988. The official departmental
privacy policy can be viewed on the department's website at www.immi.gov.au
See: http://www.immi.gov.au/functional/privacy.htm




More information about the blml mailing list