[blml] When AI confirms UI, are we completely free to act? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[richard.hills at immi.gov.au]

Tim West-Meads:

>I'm an unpassed hand and opps are silent.  If pard decides
>to "take a pot" by passing my forcing enquiry (perhaps a
>matter of finding the safest grand) it's because he no
>longer has a use for his kneecaps!

Richard Hills:

When playing Symmetric Relay with my favourite partner, he
frequently risks his kneecaps by breaking the relay when I
am an unpassed hand.

Sure we miss an odd grand slam, but we are way ahead on
imps gained when pard's potshotting rightsides our games.

Ergo, I disagree with Tim and Herman, and argue that the AI
was *not* identical to the UI.  Partner's non-system call
was either accidental or deliberate, and it was the failure
to alert by pard which gives us UI that it was accidental.


Best wishes

Richard James Hills, mentor
National Training Branch
(02) 6225 6285

Your Rights at Work
worth voting for

Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please advise
the sender and delete the message and attachments immediately.  This email,
including attachments, may contain confidential, sensitive, legally
privileged and/or copyright information.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited.
DIMA respects your privacy and has obligations under the Privacy Act 1988.
The official departmental privacy policy can be viewed on the department’s
website at www.immi.gov.au
See: http://www.immi.gov.au/functional/privacy.htm