[blml] Réf. : Re: natural bids and conventional bids

[Alain Gottcheiner]

-------Message original-------
 
I>Dear Adam,
>
>Regarding the passage that states that methods no specifically
allowed are disallowed,
>the GCC applies to the use of conventional calls, which, by
definition, are not an offer to
>play in the denomination named. Thus, a natural opening even though
not specifically
>mentioned is allowed.
 
AG : This is contradictory with the basic definitions in TFLB. 
So the ACBL's position is in a way illegal.
Dog bites man, no more.
 
NB : there should really exist some cetegory of "natural plus agreement",
bids that shan't be disallowed. So the ACBL's position, although incorrect,
it clever.
 
Best regards
 
  Alain
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070105/84fca584/attachment-0001.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1458 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070105/84fca584/attachment-0001.jpeg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 20845 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070105/84fca584/attachment-0001.gif