[blml] natural bids and conventional bids [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Grattan Endicott]

from Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
[also gesta at tiscali.co.uk]
*****************************
"Never laugh at live dragons."
                     'The Hobbit'
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Wayne Burrows" <wjburrows at gmail.com>
To: <richard.hills at immi.gov.au>
Cc: <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 7:27 AM
Subject: Re: [blml] natural bids and conventional bids [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]


> > Richard Hills:
> >
> > >>Under the ABF Alert Regulation, all calls are either "conventional"
> > >>or alternatively "natural".  A "natural" call is defined as "not
> > >>conventional".  A "conventional" call is defined as per Chapter One
> > >>of The Fabulous Law Book.
> >         
 +=+ And Chapter One of the Flagitious Law Book defines a
          conventional call as one that is not natural, citing the 
          conditions that determine a natural state. +=+

> >
> > There is also Law 40D, which gives sponsoring organisations the
> > right to create further classifications (as, for example, the EBU
> > creation of an Amber Psyche classification).
> >
> >
>
> How does L40D do that?
>
> Wayne
>
+=+ Classification is nothing to do with Law 40D. 
Red, Amber, Green are classifications applicable 
to both psyches and misbids. It is after classification 
that the basis for the Director's consequent action 
needs to be apparent.
       The Director's powers of score adjustment in 
such cases are powers to deal with illegal partnership 
understandings; Law 40D does allow regulation of 
understandings which permit actions at the one level
to be made ... etc etc. and Law 40A points to the 
potential for illegality.
                                     ~ Grattan ~   +=+