[blml] Cheater's paradise?

[Tim West-Meads]

The Law75d2 requirement is clear - a correction before play is required 
only if there *has* been MI.  Possible corrector's belief is irrelevant 
if the *agreement* actually is that 2H is natural - but his silence would 
get an automatic PP from me (in addition to any possible adjustment) 
were I to discover the agreement *was* to play 2H as something alertable.

The difference between the two scenarios is that in the former the 
silence has in no way led opps to be misinformed.  Like Richard I keep 
open the option of ruling that 2H natural was not actually the agreement.

Tim