[blml] Psyches & deviations

[Mike Amos]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tim West-Meads" <twm at cix.co.uk>
To: <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: [blml] Psyches & deviations


> John wrote: 
>> The implicit agreement is irrelevant here (and of course the EBU 
>> wouldn't even let me tell my opponents that pard was a berk and 
>> forgets the b****y system he insists we play, so I can't even tell 
>> opps we have an implicit agreement if he'd done it before) 
> 
> Technically that's not what the EBU is currently claiming to have said.
> You must disclose your implicit agreement but without any reference to 
> the forgetfulness.  Thus the correct explanation (if one knows pard 
> forgets) is "Either weak with clubs OR a red 2-suiter".

That is not an allowed method
Two suited overcalls must show at least one specified suit 

OB 11 N 7


Mike

> This implicit agreement *is* important because it might be an illegal 
> convention (were the event EBU level 2).
> 
> Tim
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> blml mailing list
> blml at amsterdamned.org
> http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml