[blml] Psyches & deviations

[Mike Amos]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tim West-Meads" <twm at cix.co.uk>
To: <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: [blml] Psyches & deviations


> Mike Amos wrote:
> 
>> > Technically that's not what the EBU is currently claiming to have 
>> > said.
>> > You must disclose your implicit agreement but without any reference 
>> > to the forgetfulness.  Thus the correct explanation (if one knows 
>> > pard forgets) is "Either weak with clubs OR a red 2-suiter".
>> 
>> That is not an allowed method
>> Two suited overcalls must show at least one specified suit 
>> 
>> OB 11 N 7
> 
> In an EBU level 2 event - sure.  But can you tell me why the restriction 
> in OB11N7 is not abolished (as it were) by the later 
> 
> Allowed at Levels 3 and 4
> 11 N 13 Developments
> All continuations by the defenders are allowed with or without 
> intervention.
> 
> Perhaps my OB is defective.
> 
> Tim
> 
>
Don't blame me I didn't write the regulations nor do I approve of the mind-boggling layout, numbering etc which obscures rather than clarifies 

11 N 13 Developments
All continuations by the defenders are allowed with or without  intervention

 means that after all the types of overcalls listed in the previous section then any continuation is allowed

ie after a two-suited overcall then you can continue how you like 

(on reflection it is apparent that your OB is defective ...... but then so to are the other 5,000 copies)

Trust me though .... I'm a TD
    1S      3C    to show Clubs or the reds is not an allowed method

Mike


> 
> _______________________________________________
> blml mailing list
> blml at amsterdamned.org
> http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070117/e59c097d/attachment.htm