[blml] GK&E (was: alertability)

[Sven Pran]

> On Behalf Of Eric Landau
.............
> >I should like to see at least one case where I would agree that the
> >information could remain undisclosed in spite of a direct question.
> 
> Allow me:
> 
> Opp: "What does that show?"
> 
> Me: "Our explicit agreement is that it shows at least 13 HCP.  However,
> I know from previous experience with this partner that he may have as
> few as 11 HCP, but only against pairs he thinks are not very good."
> 
> Opp: "Does he think we're not very good?"

Suggested reply: "Honestly I don't know!!!!!"

Seriously, regardless of my experience with such partner my first answer
would have been (and in fact is in similar situations):
"At least 13 HCP, but I have experienced him to have as low as 11 HCP".

A better example please.

Regards Sven