[blml] novel irregularity

[Peter Eidt]

Therefore the Lord gave us Law 12 A1 ;-)

Peter

From: Herman De Wael 
> Yesterday I comitted an irregularity I had never seen before.
> 
> I'm dummy, and my partner leads the CQ.
> 
> "Aren't you on the table?" inquires my RHO
> 
> "No" I say. And RHO contributes the CK.
> 
> While partner is playing my CA to the trick, my LHO says "Yes, you 
> were", and we establish that indeed the trick was in dummy.
> 
> Obviously RHO wishes to retract his CK.
> 
> We did not find a rule allowing a player to retract his "acceptance" 
> based on false information from the opponents.
> (we played on and found that it made no difference at the end, always 
> intending to award an AS if it did)
> 
> I did find L84E, but is there really nothing else?