[blml] Psyches & deviations

[Wayne Burrows]

On 22/01/07, WILLIAM SCHODER <schoderb at msn.com> wrote:
> It is illegal and insane to remove a fluked good result.  Basically if
> > you do then you are saying that if you make a bad bid then you
> > automatically deserve a bad result.  There is no law that supports
> > this approach.
> >
> > Wayne
> >
> Kindly stop ascribing to me odious use of the laws or rulings.  I am neither
> insane nor illegal nor am I prone to remove a fluked good result.

As far as I can tell I wrote this in response to something that John
Probst wrote.

> Your
> position that I am anywhere near to the Wolffian idea of bad bid = bad
> result is insulting after the years I've spent fighting it.  You obviously
> have little knowledge of what I stand for.  Nor do you understand the
> importance of not allowing spurious, illegal, and nasty use of the laws and
> stupid excuses made of whole cloth to harm non-offending players. There
> seems to be an
> underlying theme that we can get away from having to bite the bullet as TDs
> on an infraction by relegating it to a possible  "habitual" category and/or
> anything else we can find from rectifying a situation. My approach is simply
> to put the proof of the pudding on the possible infractor ---  NOW!!!!.  But
> it takes a level of ba-ls that is appearing to be more and more infrequent,
> and I'm sure wimps would not agree with me. (some females included who don't
> even have ba-ls).
>
> Kojak
>
> > >
> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> > blml mailing list
> > blml at amsterdamned.org
> > http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
> >
>
>