[blml] GK&E (was: alertability) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
Wed Jan 24 15:24:40 CET 2007
from Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
[also gesta at tiscali.co.uk]
*****************************
"They who sin with caution,
whilst concealed,
Grow impudently careless,
when revealed."
~ Susannah Centlivre.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
----- Original Message -----
From: <richard.hills at immi.gov.au>
To: <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 7:56 AM
Subject: Re: [blml] GK&E (was: alertability) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
> Sven Pran:
>
> >>>I know of no system agreements that
> >>>specify a minimum length of 5 cards for
> >>>a simple overcall, this is simply common
> >>>sense.
> >>>...........
>
> Grattan Endicott:
>
> >>+=+ See EBU Orange Book, Section 4D. +=+
>
> Orange Book section 4D2:
>
> >If a partnership habitually overcalls on
> >four card suits, or five card suits without
> >an honour, or with fewer than 6 HCP or more
> >than 18 HCP, then this should be disclosed
> >on the convention card.
>
> Richard Hills:
>
> There is a flaw in this Orange Book clause,
> since if I was an EBU player I would not
> have to disclose on my convention card that
> I habitually overcall on three card suits.
>
> :-)
>
> Perhaps the next edition of the Orange Book
> should say "habitually overcalls on four
> (or fewer) card suits". Another Canberra
> player I know raised partner's preempt with
> a void in order to get a ruff against the
> opponents' subsequent slam. Again, such an
> idiosyncratic style should be disclosed.
>
+=+ The 'next' edition of the OB took effect
on 1st August 2006. It contains the relevant
statement that I have referred to in another
reply. ("See OB 10E2"). ~ G ~ +=+
More information about the blml
mailing list