[blml] Appeal Lanaken - Peut-Peut

Herman De Wael hermandw at skynet.be
Fri Jan 26 09:21:06 CET 2007


Grattan Endicott wrote:
> from Grattan Endicott
> grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
> [also gesta at tiscali.co.uk]
> *****************************
> "They who sin with caution, 
>                          whilst concealed,
>  Grow impudently careless,
>                           when revealed."
>                  ~ Susannah Centlivre.
> ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Nigel" <Guthrie at NTLworld.com>
> To: "BLML" <blml at rtflb.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 3:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [blml] Appeal Lanaken - Peut-Peut
> 
> 
>> [Herman De Wael]
>>
>>> You open 4Di, pre-empt in spades. Your partner
>> <  bids 6Di. They double.  You bid 6Sp. Partner 
>>> now bids 7Di. They double. Do you really need 
>>> your hand to tell me what you would do?
>>>
>>> Herman De Wael wrote:
>>>   
>> [nige1]
>> Usually Pass would be automatic but if your spades 
>> are solid against any break, then 7S is possible; but
>> it could still be wrong e.g.
>> YOU S:AKQJT987 H:xx D:42 C:xx
>> OXO S- H- D:AQJT987653 C:Axx
>> Where 7D is the only making slam.
>>
> +=+ I would like to know what our systemic 
> understanding is in relation to the 6D bid - i.e. 
> was my 6S bid correct?  But the information 
> would have no effect upon my Pass of 7D - 
> partner is in control and has not invited me 
> to do anything more. 
>                              ~ Grattan ~   +=+
> 

You are playing in the Belgian seventh division (that's two down from 
myself). You have no agreement whatsoever on 6D - it must be "to 
play", and you have serious reasons to believe he will have forgotten 
the system.

-- 
Herman DE WAEL
Antwerpen Belgium
http://www.hdw.be



More information about the blml mailing list