[blml] Réf. : Re: Nine Princes in Amber [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Alain Gottcheiner]

-------Message original-------
 
 
Richard wrote:
 
> (1) You, South, incorrectly explain upon East's enquiry that
> the 1NT rebid was 15-17, since your North-South partnership
> is playing Acol.  However, your partnership plays a three-
> quarter weak 1NT opening bid.  In third seat a 1NT opening
> bid is 15-17, therefore causing a 1NT rebid to be 12-14.
 
Did I forget the system (XX is an non-suggested LA) or did I forget that
I had dealt and passed?  While the UI from the lack of alert may be what
woke me up to partner being in third seat the auction itself is AI and
XX is not an LA.
 
AG : good point. If YT was the "offender", the latter explanation would be
quite reasonable. 
The standard for disallowing calls under UI has been shifted from "might
have been suggested" to "was unmistakably suggested", and this is one case
where it matters.
 
However, some past threads have told that, while the auction is AI, anything
that focuses partner's attention on some feature of the auction is UI, as
could be the case here.
 
Best regards
 
   Alain
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070129/e64e2717/attachment-0001.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1458 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070129/e64e2717/attachment-0001.jpeg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 20533 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070129/e64e2717/attachment-0001.gif