[blml] Réf. : Re: Rif. : Re: Minor/Major

[Alain Gottcheiner]

-------Message original-------
 
De : Sven Pran
Date : 29/01/2007 17:06:12
A : blml
Sujet : Re: [blml] Rif. : Re: Minor/Major
 
 
I am not quite sure if you try to express that the complementary is indeed
"inadvertent exposure", the term used in Law 50B. 
 
AG : The question is indeed to determine whether "inadvertent exposure"
means : 
1. "the card is exposed, but the player didn't intend ANY CARD to be exposed
, e.g. it fell from the player's hand.
2. "the card is exposed, but the player didn't intend THAT CARD to be
exposed", e.g. he purposely pulled a card, albeit the wrong one. 
 
I vote for the latter. It's the equivalent of pulling the wrong bidding card
 which is considered inadvertent provided it makes sense. 
 
Best regards
 
  Alain
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070129/26bb7f7c/attachment-0001.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1458 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070129/26bb7f7c/attachment-0001.jpeg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 21075 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070129/26bb7f7c/attachment-0001.gif