[blml] Warsaw appeal no. 13 [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Wayne Burrows]

On 01/07/07, richard.hills at immi.gov.au <richard.hills at immi.gov.au> wrote:
> Richard Hills:
> Even if, for the sake of argument, the hesitator's
> statement about their alleged extraordinary partnership
> agreement was factual, the sloooow 4H could have reminded
> the hesitator's partner about this obscure extraordinary
> partnership agreement, while an in-tempo 4H might have
> seen the hesitator's partner carelessly pass a forcing
> bid.

This seems incredibly unlikely to have occurred here.  The East hand
had undisclosed spade support and was not sure that there was in fact
a heart fit.  Therefore it is as close as certain as I have seen that
East would take another bid.

Its more likely on this auction that any misunderstanding would
propell them to slam rather than keep them out IMHO.

Wayne