[blml] Warsaw appeal no. 13 [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[richard.hills at immi.gov.au]

Wayne Burrows:

>It is unclear what the best ruling is here since we would need to
>know more about the EW agreements.

Appeals Committee:

>>Noticed that while West had stated that 4H showed the HK, East
>>had never mentioned this.

Richard Hills:

Given that there is very strong evidence that West has already
perpetrated a terminological inexactitude in describing the East-
West partnership agreements, seeking further information about the
third-round East-West agreements seems to be an exercise that only
a credulous Appeals Committee would indulge in.

Translation:

Would you buy a used parked car from this man?

:-)


Best wishes

Richard James Hills, amicus curiae
Level 6 Aqua Training Suite, DIAC
02 6225 6776

Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please advise
the sender and delete the message and attachments immediately.  This email,
including attachments, may contain confidential, sensitive, legally
privileged and/or copyright information.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. DIAC respects your privacy and
has obligations under the Privacy Act 1988. The official departmental
privacy policy can be viewed on the department's website at www.immi.gov.au
See: http://www.immi.gov.au/functional/privacy.htm