[blml] Decimal HCP ranges.
Tim West-Meads
twm at cix.co.uk
Mon Jul 2 13:31:00 CEST 2007
Nigel wrote:
>
> I am sorry that I misinterpreted your notation Tim.
No problem. I think what you did was suggest a different method of
interpreting the notation.
> Suppose that I (or another Walrus) partner Tim. Suppose, also, that I
> insist that Tim rigidly adher to my bidding methods including what I
> call a 12-14 HCP no-trump.
>
> Presumably, Tim will rewrite the range as 9.5-16 HCP on his
> convention card.
The CCs will say "1N =12-14, Tim's partner is a walrus - if you notice
Tim bidding 1N on 10/11/15 counts please don't *tell* the walrus as his
sensibilities may be offended".
NB, it's unlikely that any walrus will be prepared to pay me enough to
make me play with him :)
> I suppose that BLMLers agree that Tim's *9.5-16* is a more accurate
> statement of the decimal HCP range than the my *12.0-15.0*
I wouldn't use decimal notation for this sort of partner because I don't
think it would help opponents.
> I prefer the my Walrus-friendly version of the decimal notation to
> Tim's version.
Nor do I expect walrii to use a mechanism other than strict HCP for
their disclosure.
Tim
More information about the blml
mailing list