[blml] Multiple infractions (was ...St. Louis) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Grattan Endicott]

Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet .co.uk
[also gesta at tiscali.co.uk]
**********************
" Words are but the signs of ideas;
I wish, however, that the instrument 
might be less apt to decay, and that 
signs might be permanent like the 
things they denote. " 
                      (Samuel Johnson)                   
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sven Pran" <svenpran at online.no>
To: "blml" <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 7:47 AM
Subject: Re: [blml] Multiple infractions 
(was ...St. Louis) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]


> 
> I am arguing that the Director shall have all such 
> revoke cards withdrawn by  the respective players 
> without any consequence other than that the existence
> of the card exposed by one defender shall be 
> unauthorized information to his partner. Whether the 
> situation should result in any adjusted score must be
> considered and ruled by the Director after the play 
> of the board is completed.
> 
> However, I shall accept an interpretation (by 
> competent authority) that the card so withdrawn by 
> a defender shall become a major penalty card.
> 
> Regards Sven
> 
+=+ As far as the WBFLC goes, even if ton picks this 
up for consideration no 'official interpretation' can be 
agreed until Shanghai. By that time the subject will perhaps
have become largely academic - with the next Code of
Laws imminently to be implemented.
                                ~ Grattan ~   +=+