[blml] Multiple infractions (was ...St. Louis) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Todd M. Zimnoch]

Grattan Endicott wrote:
>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>From: "Sven Pran" <svenpran at online.no>
>>To: "blml" <blml at rtflb.org>
>>Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 7:47 AM
>>Subject: Re: [blml] Multiple infractions (was ...St. Louis) 
> 
> [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
> 
>>
>>>However, I shall accept an interpretation (by competent 
>>>authority) that the card so withdrawn by a defender shall 
>>>become a major penalty card.
>>>
>>
>>I think this is covered by Law, we don't need such an 
>>interpretation.  John
>>
> 
> +=+ Hence there can be no argument about it?   ~ G ~   +=+

On the specific question of withdrawn cards, the law is 
clear.  The general question of how to resolve multiple 
infractions, either committed by the same side or 
alternating sides, could use clarification, if not in these 
Laws then the next.

-Todd