[blml] Multiple infractions (was ...St. Louis) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[richard.hills at immi.gov.au]

David Grabiner:

>I will not allow West to accept the 1H call
>once East has taken an action,

Richard Hills:

Under what Law are you over-riding Law 29A?

If my preferred chronological order rule was
part of the Scope, then as Director I would:

(1) Ask West if West wanted to accept
South's 1H opening bid out of turn, then

(2) Ask South if South wanted to accept
East's overcall out of turn.

If the answers to questions 1 and 2 were
both "Yes", then the auction would be:

WEST      NORTH     EAST      SOUTH
          (Dealer)
---       ---       ---       1H
---       ---       1S        ?

and there would be no further penalty to
either North-South or East-West.

:-)


Best wishes

Richard James Hills, amicus curiae
Level 6 Aqua Training Suite, DIAC
02 6225 6776

Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please advise
the sender and delete the message and attachments immediately.  This email,
including attachments, may contain confidential, sensitive, legally
privileged and/or copyright information.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. DIAC respects your privacy and
has obligations under the Privacy Act 1988. The official departmental
privacy policy can be viewed on the department's website at www.immi.gov.au
See: http://www.immi.gov.au/functional/privacy.htm