[blml] Zonal Delegation of L12c3

[Marvin French]

From: "Harald Skjæran"

>Both as a player, TD and AC-member I like L12C3.
The problem with L12C2 if applied by the letter, is that it's far too
harsh
on the OS (maybe not a big problem if you want to treat all offenders as
cheats) and also far too generous for the NOS (which is a problem for
the
rest of the field).

I take it then that you would change the revoke laws in order to
"restore equity" instead of applying the automatic penalty. Most of us
players want simple laws that are easy to apply and result in identical
penalties or score adjustments for identical irregularities. Like L12C2.
Protecting the field is not a legitimate part of the game, nor is the
denial of an occasional windfall for the NOS.

Marv
Marvin L. French
San Diego, California
www.marvinfrench.com