Réf. : Re: [blml] Two UI/AI cases [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Tim West-Meads]

Alain wrote:

> AG : The problem, and the reason for my question, is the following 
> : there are some situations where you're not allowed to use
> information that was at your disposal in full legality, because
> somebody (especially partner) has reminded you of that information. 

Maybe, but the L16 intro is unequivocal on this particular one: "Players
are authorised to base their calls and plays on information from legal
calls and plays"
Taken together with L20b: "During the auction period, a player is
entitled to have all  previous calls restated when it is his turn to call,
unless he is required by law to pass; Alerts should be included in the
restatement." 

We simply cannot deny knowledge of the *actual* auction to a player.

Tim