[blml] Ignorantia juris non excusat (was Equity) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
Brian
brian at meadows.pair.com
Thu Jul 19 12:38:56 CEST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I think you're missing a point too, Herman. My main dislike of the
psyching situation is that players basically don't know at what point
this "implicit understanding" will cut in. And of course, if you do
accept that one or two psyches create an implicit understanding which
must be disclosed, then it's likely (maybe not if you live in
Australia!) that your NCBO will then have you for playing an illegal
system the moment you disclose that implicit understanding.
I stick with my view, the Laws give you the right to psych, but then
more or less take it away again, unless you're a new partnership.
Brian.
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:19:53 +0200
Herman De Wael <hermandw at skynet.be> wrote:
<snip>
- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGnz9AX39R2QaHMdMRAr0aAKCe4CFhgLLpd1fb6W0kGMlW5QvzDwCfRFaO
yj5oAlvGI65tOltp3/VnH3g=
=9ls8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the blml
mailing list